Top
Stories

Featured Article Getting Minorities to Buy In on Retirement February 13, 2012
Featured Article State Law Favored Over Feds in Overtime Case February 12, 2012
Featured Article Adopting a Social Media Mind-Set February 12, 2012
Featured Article Social Media and Collaboration Tools February 12, 2012
Featured Article Arbitration Pact Barring Class Lawsuits Violates NLRA February 12, 2012
Featured Article The Last Word: Backyard Retirement Plan February 11, 2012
Featured Article State Public Sector Retirement Plan Roundup February 10, 2012
Featured Article States Taking a Hard Look at Pensions February 10, 2012
Featured Article Wisconsin's Tough Choice February 10, 2012
Featured Article Small Employers Exploring Health Care Exchange Options February 8, 2012

Dear Workforce

Q: Which Interview Questions Will Help Us Understand the Emotional Intelligence of Applicants?


Our manufacturing company is gearing up to do significant hiring of line workers. During interviews, we want to ask questions that give a glimpse into the emotional intelligence of applicants. Which particular types of tests would prove useful in this regard?
—Getting Emotional, HR manager, manufacturing, Cairo, Egypt

A:

Dear Getting Emotional:

The first thing that is important to consider is the difference between a test and an interview. While tests and interviews are held to the same basic legal requirements, they are very different animals. A test is made up of questions that have been verified and statistically proved to predict a specific outcome (such as emotional intelligence). Tests used for employment should be developed in a manner that provides many different types of data, all demonstrating that questions on the test predict the construct of interest.

Interviews are a bit looser in nature. They rely on fewer questions that tend to be more open-ended. Interviews are often oriented toward the discussion of work-related behaviors and accomplishments that indicate whether an applicant displays certain key competencies.

The common link between these two types of hiring tools is the fact that, to be both legal and effective, they must directly measure key traits required for successful job performance. This means that anytime you are considering measuring a trait such as emotional intelligence, via either an interview or a test, you must first take steps to demonstrate that it is clearly job-related.

This can be accomplished in many ways, the most common being a job analysis study. EI describes the ability to be "self-aware" in work-related situations and to react to them in ways that demonstrate an awareness of how your actions affect others. It is an important trait for teamwork and leadership behaviors. There are many ways to measure it, and the method you choose to employ depends on other aspects of your hiring process and the job itself.

In your situation, you have the option to use either an interview or a test. If you use an interview, you should be certain that it is a standardized, structured, behavioral interview that uses work-related questions to determine how an applicant may have handled specific problems in the past.

The scoring for these questions should be broken down into options that indicate different levels of EI. If you use a test, the test should be one that has been documented to measure EI, as it relates to the impact it has on performance at the job in question. You should ask any company providing your EI test to provide documentation that proves it has been effective in the past in similar jobs.

You should use a test that has a good pedigree for measuring EI in jobs similar to yours. It is probably easier to do this than to attempt to make up interview questions that you believe measure EI or to make changes to your interview process. Furthermore, my experience with EI has found it to be most frequently measured using tests as opposed to interviews.

Just remember: Any vendor that cannot provide documentation to prove the statistical work in creating/validating tests is probably not your best bet.

SOURCE: Charles A. Handler, Rocket-Hire, New Orleans, June 6, 2007

LEARN MORE: Please see Making Emotional Intelligence Work for more on tying EI to job competencies. Also, a good description of EI is found here.

The information contained in this article is intended to provide useful information on the topic covered, but should not be construed as legal advice or a legal opinion. Also remember that state laws may differ from the federal law.

Ask a Question

Dear Workforce Newsletter

Ask a Question

Sign Up!

Get the Dear Workforce e-newsletter.

Leave A Comment

Guidelines: Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. You are fully responsible for the content you post.

Daily Q&A

What Can We Do When an Employee Has Exhausted the Leave-of-Absence Time Allowed by Our Workers' Comp Policy?

We have an employee who has been on workers' compensation for two years now—the claim is grandfathered under our old policy, but it's since changed. Now, when injured employees are on workers' compensation, they receive two-thirds of their pay and must use sick days and vacation to cover the remaining one-third. May we begin requiring the injured employee to use personal time?

—Sick About This, benefits coordinator, mining/oil/gas, Illinois

Read Answer

Stay Connected

Join our community for unlimited access to the latest tips, news and information in the HR world.

HR Jobs

View All Job Listings

Search