Top
Stories

The Ethical Workplace Blog Blog Going Nuclear—More Safe Power for Georgia's People February 14, 2012
Featured Article Getting Minorities to Buy In on Retirement February 13, 2012
Featured Article State Law Favored Over Feds in Overtime Case February 12, 2012
Featured Article Adopting a Social Media Mind-Set February 12, 2012
Featured Article Social Media and Collaboration Tools February 12, 2012
Featured Article Arbitration Pact Barring Class Lawsuits Violates NLRA February 12, 2012
Featured Article The Last Word: Backyard Retirement Plan February 11, 2012
Featured Article Wisconsin's Tough Choice February 10, 2012
Featured Article State Public Sector Retirement Plan Roundup February 10, 2012

Latest News

Employers Are Divided Over Adequacy of 401(k)s

All employers surveyed named a variety of obstacles to employees reaching their retirement income objectives.

  • June 8, 2009
  • Comments (0)

Employers are evenly split between those who say their 401(k) plans can provide adequate retirement savings for employees and those who say they can’t or are unsure, according to a Mercer survey.

Also, 68 percent of the 180 employers offering 401(k) plans that were surveyed said achieving adequate retirement savings for employees is a shared responsibility between employers and employees, according to a Mercer news release about the survey results.

Of employers with defined-benefit plans open to new employers, 81 percent believe achieving adequate savings is a shared responsibility, and 15 percent believe it’s predominantly the employer’s responsibility.

Just over half (53 percent) of employers that have suspended matching contributions to their 401(k) believe planning an adequate savings is a shared responsibility.

All employers surveyed named a variety of obstacles to employees reaching their retirement income objectives, with 38 percent citing low participation in retirement savings plans; 32 percent citing inadequate savings rate; 17 percent, volatile markets; 6 percent, poor investment decisions; 4 percent, borrowing from retirement savings; 2 percent, cash-out at termination of the plan; and 1 percent, citing that accounts are spent too quickly in retirement.

“Some 35 years after the enactment of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act and its subsequent amendments and associated regulations, Americans may have no more secure a retirement future than in 1974,” Amy Reynolds, a Mercer principal and defined-contribution retirement consultant, said in the Mercer news release.

“Today’s employers are increasingly relying on employee savings plans, such as the 401(k), as the foundation for their workers’ retirement income—yet recent economic pressures underscore the weakness of this approach.”

Filed by Timothy Inklebarger of Pensions & Investments, a sister publication of Workforce Management To comment, e-mail editors@workforce.com.

Workforce Management's online news feed is now available via Twitter

Leave A Comment

Guidelines: Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. You are fully responsible for the content you post.

Daily Q&A

How Do We Build a World-Class Recruiting Department?

I need to establish a strategic plan on how we can become a world-class staffing/recruiting department. Unfortunately, all the historical data from previous recruiting managers got tossed. Do you have any simple tips on how to begin this ambitious plan?

—World-Class Ambition, staffing manager, software/services, Pennsylvania

Read Answer

Stay Connected

Join our community for unlimited access to the latest tips, news and information in the HR world.

HR Jobs

View All Job Listings

Search