Top
Stories

Latest News

Non-Binding Say-on-Pay Votes Part of Executive Compensation Reform Proposal

Such shareholder votes would be required of all public companies under legislation proposed by the Obama administration

  • June 11, 2009
  • Comments (0)

Non-binding say-on-pay shareholder votes would be required of all public companies under legislation proposed by the Obama administration Wednesday, June 10.

Also, the SEC would oversee corporate compensation committees to ensure their independence, according to a statement Wednesday by Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner.

The legislation is part of broader executive compensation reform that would develop a standard to “reward innovation and prudent risk taking, without creating misaligned incentives,” the statement said.

“I want to be clear on what we are not doing. We are not capping pay. We are not setting forth precise prescriptions for how companies should set compensation, which can often be counterproductive,” Geithner said in the statement.

Principles of the reform outlined by Geithner are:

● Compensation plans should properly measure and reward performance.

● Compensation should be structured to account for the time horizon of risks.

● Compensation practices should be aligned with sound risk management.

● Golden parachutes and supplemental retirement packages should be re-examined to ensure they align the interests of executives and shareholders.

● The process of establishing compensation should promote transparency and accountability in the process of setting compensation.

“This financial crisis had many significant causes, but executive compensation practices were a contributing factor. Incentives for short-term gains overwhelmed the checks and balances meant to mitigate against the risk of excess leverage,” Geithner said in the statement.

Mary L Schapiro, SEC chairman, said in a statement Wednesday that the SEC “is actively considering a package of new proxy disclosure rules that will provide further sunshine on compensation decisions.”

They include how a company and its board manage risks, potential conflicts of interest by compensation consultants, and the experience and qualifications of director nominees to serve on the board and particular board committees.

John D. Heine, SEC spokesman, said a time frame for the SEC to propose the rules wasn’t available.

Filed by Barry B. Burr of Pensions & Investments, a sister publication of Workforce Management. To comment, e-mail editors@workforce.com.

Workforce Management's online news feed is now available via Twitter

Leave A Comment

Guidelines: Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. You are fully responsible for the content you post.

Daily Q&A

How Do We Persuade Management to Create Flex Schedules?

My company doesn’t have an official flex schedule policy, which means that some departments are able to have a flex schedule while departments such as mine do not (I work in human resources). What is the best way to present a request for consideration to our human resources executives to see if this arrangement could benefit us?

—Nimble We’re Not, HR generalist, financial/insurance/real estate, Iowa City, Iowa

Read Answer

Stay Connected

Join our community for unlimited access to the latest tips, news and information in the HR world.

HR Jobs

View All Job Listings

Search