Top
Stories

Featured Article Getting Minorities to Buy In on Retirement February 13, 2012
Featured Article State Law Favored Over Feds in Overtime Case February 12, 2012
Featured Article Adopting a Social Media Mind-Set February 12, 2012
Featured Article Social Media and Collaboration Tools February 12, 2012
Featured Article Arbitration Pact Barring Class Lawsuits Violates NLRA February 12, 2012
Featured Article The Last Word: Backyard Retirement Plan February 11, 2012
Featured Article State Public Sector Retirement Plan Roundup February 10, 2012
Featured Article States Taking a Hard Look at Pensions February 10, 2012
Featured Article Wisconsin's Tough Choice February 10, 2012
Featured Article Small Employers Exploring Health Care Exchange Options February 8, 2012

Latest News

Congressional Analysis Finds Health Care Plan Excise Tax Would Hit 34 Percent of Group Plans in 2019

About one-third of group health care plans would be affected by a proposed 40 percent excise tax on insurers and third-party administrators offering high-cost health plans by 2019, a congressional analysis finds.

  • October 23, 2009
  • Comments (0)

About one-third of group health care plans would be affected by a proposed 40 percent excise tax on insurers and third-party administrators offering the highest-cost health plans by 2019, according to a congressional analysis.

U.S. Rep. Joe Courtney, R-Connecticut, who requested that the Joint Committee on Taxation analyze the provision in health care reform legislation that the Senate Finance Committee passed last week, released the results Tuesday, October 20.

Under the provision, the excise tax would apply to that portion of a group health care plan premium that exceeds $8,000 for individual coverage and $21,000 for family coverage. For plans covering early retirees and employees in certain high-risk professions, the tax threshold would be $9,850 for individuals and $26,000 for families.

In 2013, the first year the tax would be imposed, the Joint Committee on Taxation estimates that 19 percent of plans offering single coverage and 14 percent of plans offering family coverage would be affected by the excise tax.

However, the analysis found that the percentage of plans affected would increase steadily in succeeding years. By 2019, 34 percent of plans offering single coverage and 31 percent of plans offering family coverage would be subject to the tax.

Under the measure, the tax thresholds would rise in tandem with the annual increase in the Consumer Price Index, plus one percentage point. However, the Joint Committee on Taxation noted that medical inflation is expected to increase even more and boost the percentage of plans affected.

While the tax would be paid by insurers and by third-party administrators in the case of self-funded plans, it is likely that costs would be passed on to buyers, according to the analysis.

“Generally, we expect the insurer to pass along the cost of the excise tax to consumers by increasing the price of health coverage,” the analysis said.

Of five congressional committees that have passed health care reform legislation this year, the Senate Finance Committee is the only one to include an excise tax based on cost of coverage.

The Congressional Budget Office estimated earlier that the provision would raise more than $200 billion over a 10-year period.

Filed by Jerry Geisel of Business Insurance, a sister publication of Workforce Management. To comment, e-mail editors@workforce.com.

Stay informed and connected. Get human resources news and HR features via Workforce Management’s Twitter feed or RSS feeds for mobile devices and news readers.

Leave A Comment

Guidelines: Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. You are fully responsible for the content you post.

Daily Q&A

What Can We Do When an Employee Has Exhausted the Leave-of-Absence Time Allowed by Our Workers' Comp Policy?

We have an employee who has been on workers' compensation for two years now—the claim is grandfathered under our old policy, but it's since changed. Now, when injured employees are on workers' compensation, they receive two-thirds of their pay and must use sick days and vacation to cover the remaining one-third. May we begin requiring the injured employee to use personal time?

—Sick About This, benefits coordinator, mining/oil/gas, Illinois

Read Answer

Stay Connected

Join our community for unlimited access to the latest tips, news and information in the HR world.

HR Jobs

View All Job Listings

Search