Top
Stories

Latest News

Worker Testimony, Expert Opinion Justify FMLA Leave

At issue in the case was whether a doctor’s note establishing incapacitation for two days plus an employee’s testimony that she remained ill two additional days satisfied FMLA leave requirements from her job as a medical receptionist.

  • March 19, 2010
  • Comments (0)

A worker’s testimony plus an expert medical opinion can qualify an employee for leave under the Family and Medical Leave Act, a federal appeals court has ruled.

The ruling in Rachael Schaar vs. Lehigh Valley Health Services Inc. overturned a lower court finding that the employee failed to establish through medical evidence that she was incapacitated for more than three days and suffered a serious health condition as required for FMLA leave.

The ruling Thursday, March 11, by the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals added to the split among federal appeals courts over whether lay testimony can establish that an employee suffers a serious health condition.

Incapacitation for more than three days can help establish a serious health condition for FMLA purposes, the court ruled. At issue in the case was whether a doctor’s note establishing incapacitation for two days plus Rachael Schaar’s testimony that she remained ill two additional days in September 2005 satisfied FMLA leave requirements from her job as a medical receptionist.

In addition to prescribing medication, a doctor wrote a note advising Schaar’s supervisor that her illness prevented her from working for two days. But she did not return to work until several days after that and was terminated. She then sued, alleging interference and discrimination in violation of the FMLA.

A trial court granted Lehigh Valley summary judgment, holding that Schaar failed to present medical evidence that she was incapacitated for more than three days. The lower court said expert medical testimony was necessary to establish incapacity.

However, the federal appeals court in Philadelphia disagreed. It said it could not find a regulation that excluded all lay testimony regarding the length of an employee’s incapacitation and remanded the case for further proceedings.

Federal appeals courts have diverged on the issue, ruling that evidence of incapacitation must come exclusively from a medical professional, that lay testimony can supplement a medical professional’s opinion, or that lay testimony is sufficient by itself. 

 Filed by Roberto Ceniceros of Business Insurance, a sister publication of Workforce Management. To comment, e-mail editors@workforce.com.

 

Stay informed and connected. Get human resources news and HR features via Workforce Management's Twitter feed or RSS feeds for mobile devices and news readers.

Leave A Comment

Guidelines: Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. You are fully responsible for the content you post.

Daily Q&A

How Do We Build a World-Class Recruiting Department?

I need to establish a strategic plan on how we can become a world-class staffing/recruiting department. Unfortunately, all the historical data from previous recruiting managers got tossed. Do you have any simple tips on how to begin this ambitious plan?

—World-Class Ambition, staffing manager, software/services, Pennsylvania

Read Answer

Stay Connected

Join our community for unlimited access to the latest tips, news and information in the HR world.

HR Jobs

View All Job Listings

Search