Top
Stories

Featured Article 2013: A Time for Re-imagining How Work Gets Done December 13, 2012
Featured Article 2013 Employment Forecast: A Fiscal Cliffhanger December 13, 2012
Blog: The Practical Employer 12 is the Magic Number: 12 Thoughts for Your Workplace December 12, 2012
Latest News Clients Kind of Blue Over IBM's 401(k) Surprise December 11, 2012
Blog: Work in Progress Fifty Shades of a Holiday Bonus December 11, 2012
Blog: The Practical Employer What Are Right-To-Work Laws, and Should you Care? December 11, 2012
Featured Article What’s Wrong With Your Diversity Training? December 10, 2012
Featured Article It’s Mobile HR Software, but It’s Not an App December 10, 2012
Featured Article Five Mobile Apps for Recruiters December 10, 2012

Latest News

Most Employers Waiting to Cover Adult Children, Survey Finds

The majority of employers do not plan to extend group health care coverage to employees' adult children until 2011, when required to do so by the new health care law, a new survey shows.

  • Published: May 19, 2010
  • Updated: September 15, 2011
  • Comments (0)

More than three-fourths of employers say they will wait until the effective date to comply with a provision in the health care reform law that requires group plans to extend coverage to employees’ adult children up to age 26, according to a new survey.

Among 661 employers responding to the survey by New York-based Towers Watson & Co., 16 percent said they would extend the coverage before the required effective date, 78 percent said they would wait until the effective date, and 6 percent did not yet know.

The law requires the extension to be made on the first day of the plan year that starts after September 23. For calendar-year plans, which are the most common, the effective date is January 1, 2011.

Few employers intend to comply early because of the demands that would put on company resources, said Randy Abbott, a Towers Watson senior consultant in Wellesley Hills, Massachusetts.

“Early adoption means more communications and more administrative issues to deal with. At a time when many employers are resource-constrained, they are prepared, unless there is overwhelming demand, to wait until the effective date,” Abbott said.

So far, just one major self-funded employer—United Technologies Corp. in Hartford, Connecticut—has said it will comply early. Effective immediately, the company is continuing coverage of employees’ adult children enrolled in its plan who would have lost coverage for reasons that include graduation from school.

Then on July 1, coverage will be offered to employees’ adult children up to age 26 regardless of whether they are covered now, unless they are eligible to enroll in another employer’s health care plan.

A top company executive earlier said United Technologies is complying sooner than required because it is the right thing to do and because such action is consistent with its practice of providing competitive benefits.

Interim final regulations published by the Internal Revenue Service, and the departments of Labor and Health and Human Services estimate that the coverage expansion would increase premiums by an average of 0.7 percent in 2011.

Filed by Jerry Geisel of Business Insurance, a sister publication of Workforce Management. To comment, e-mail editors@workforce.com.

Stay informed and connected. Get human resources news and HR features via Workforce Management’s Twitter feed or RSS feeds for mobile devices and news readers.

Leave A Comment

Guidelines: Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. You are fully responsible for the content you post.

Daily Q&A

How to Address Flagging Motivation?

How do I increase motivation levels in the department? How do I brand my business unit as an attractive place to work? I have top-notch IT professionals in my business unit who feel they are "children of a lesser God" because they are non-billable resources and do not get plum postings abroad, nor the glamour that goes with them. As a result, their motivation suffers.

—-- Feeling Their Pain, human resources generalist, software/services, Mumbai, India

Read Answer

Stay Connected

Join our community for unlimited access to the latest tips, news and information in the HR world.

HR Jobs

View All Job Listings

Search