Top
Stories

Featured Article The Last Word: Backyard Retirement Plan February 11, 2012
Featured Article State Public Sector Retirement Plan Roundup February 10, 2012
Featured Article States Taking a Hard Look at Pensions February 10, 2012
Featured Article Wisconsin's Tough Choice February 10, 2012
Featured Article Small Employers Exploring Health Care Exchange Options February 8, 2012
Featured Article Tech Talk February 8, 2012
Featured Article Infor heads to the Big Apple February 8, 2012
Latest News Chrysler Rolling Out Bonuses February 8, 2012
Latest News IT Employment Hits All-Time High February 8, 2012

Latest News

Retirement Plan Value Down Over 10 Years, Study Shows

Among the industries analyzed, retail and wholesale contributions were down 33 percent for the 10-year period; manufacturing, down 29 percent; and energy, natural resources, gas and electric, down 24 percent.

  • July 23, 2010
  • Comments (0)

The combined value of U.S. employer-sponsored retirement plans in eight industries, as measured by percentage of pay employers are contributing, declined 19 percent to 6.36 percent from 7.88 percent of pay for the 10-year period ended December 31, 2008, according to an analysis by Towers Watson & Co.

A 53 percent drop in the value of defined-benefit plans fueled the overall decline, with DB contributions slipping to 1.99 percent of pay from 4.19 percent in 1998. That decrease was somewhat offset by a 38 percent increase in defined-contribution plan value, with contributions rising to 3.99 percent of pay in 2008 from 2.89 percent in 1998.

Among the industries analyzed, retail and wholesale contributions were down 33 percent for the 10-year period; manufacturing, down 29 percent; energy, natural resources, gas and electric, down 24 percent; pharmaceuticals, down 13 percent; high tech, down 10 percent; financial services, down 9 percent; health care, down 4 percent; and services, up 3 percent.

“Companies now are giving their employees less retirement value than they were before,” said Kevin Wagner, Towers Watson retirement practice director, in a telephone interview. “It’s a redistribution of value of what an employee receives for giving an employer a year of service.”

Towers Watson’s analysis included total retirement benefits in DB and DC plans, retiree medical and retiree health insurance plans.  

Filed by Timothy Inklebarger of Pensions & Investments, a sister publication of Workforce Management. To comment, e-mail editors@workforce.com.

 

Stay informed and connected. Get human resources news and HR features via Workforce Management’s Twitter feed or RSS feeds for mobile devices and news readers.

Leave A Comment

Guidelines: Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. You are fully responsible for the content you post.

Daily Q&A

Our HR Function Is Doubling Headcount. What Do We Need to Do to Prepare?

I am one of two human resources generalists at our 300-employee company, which expects to at least double its headcount in 2011. My boss has instructed me to draw up a plan on how the HR department should be developed to keep pace with the growth. Where do I begin this daunting task?

—Growth Spurt, software and services, Texas

Read Answer

Stay Connected

Join our community for unlimited access to the latest tips, news and information in the HR world.

HR Jobs

View All Job Listings

Search