Top
Stories

Featured Article The Last Word: Backyard Retirement Plan February 11, 2012
Featured Article State Public Sector Retirement Plan Roundup February 10, 2012
Featured Article States Taking a Hard Look at Pensions February 10, 2012
Featured Article Wisconsin's Tough Choice February 10, 2012
Featured Article Small Employers Exploring Health Care Exchange Options February 8, 2012
Featured Article Tech Talk February 8, 2012
Featured Article Infor heads to the Big Apple February 8, 2012
Latest News Chrysler Rolling Out Bonuses February 8, 2012
Latest News IT Employment Hits All-Time High February 8, 2012

Latest News

Pension Funding Relief Ranges From $19 Billion to $63 Billion, Towers Watson Analysis Shows

The amount depends on which of two provisions and which plan years employers choose, the analysis finds.

  • August 3, 2010
  • Comments (0)

Employers that sponsor defined-benefit pension plans could collectively reduce their contributions by a range of $19 billion to $63 billion as a result of recently enacted pension reform legislation, Towers Watson & Co. said in an analysis released Monday, August 2.

Under the Preservation of Access to Care for Medicare Beneficiaries and the Pension Relief Act of 2010, employers with underfunded defined-benefit pension plans may elect to amortize funding shortfalls for any two plan years between 2008 and 2011 either over a 15-year period or by making interest-only payments for two years followed by seven years of amortization.

The Towers Watson analysis found that required contributions could be reduced by $19 billion to $63 billion, depending on which of the two provisions and which plan years employers choose.

Before passage of the law, the minimum required contributions in aggregate would have been $78.4 billion for the 2010 plan year, $131 billion for 2011, and about $159 billion for both 2012 and 2013.

“The pension funding relief law significantly eases some of the financial pressures employers had been facing, at least for two years,” said Mike Archer, a senior consultant at Towers Watson based in Parsippany, New Jersey, in a statement.

“However, the choices that employers make now will have an impact on the magnitude of their future pension funding obligations. In addition, the new law’s cash-flow rule … has the potential to make contribution requirements more volatile for companies that avail themselves of the relief,” he said.

Filed by Joanne Wojcik of Business Insurance, a sister publication of Workforce Management. To comment, e-mail editors@workforce.com.

Stay informed and connected. Get human resources news and HR features via Workforce Management's Twitter feed or RSS feeds for mobile devices and news readers.

Leave A Comment

Guidelines: Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. You are fully responsible for the content you post.

Daily Q&A

Our HR Function Is Doubling Headcount. What Do We Need to Do to Prepare?

I am one of two human resources generalists at our 300-employee company, which expects to at least double its headcount in 2011. My boss has instructed me to draw up a plan on how the HR department should be developed to keep pace with the growth. Where do I begin this daunting task?

—Growth Spurt, software and services, Texas

Read Answer

Stay Connected

Join our community for unlimited access to the latest tips, news and information in the HR world.

HR Jobs

View All Job Listings

Search