Top
Stories
Featured Article The CYA Report: 'Re-shoring' America February 12, 2013
Blog: The Practical Employer FMLA Compliance Is Not as Easy as the Labor Department Says February 12, 2013
Blog: The Ethical Workplace Credentialing, Competency, and MOOCs February 11, 2013
Blog: The Practical Employer Laughing Out the Door: Half of Employees Admit to Stealing Corporate Data February 11, 2013
Featured Article Data Bank Focus: Getting Them to Stay February 8, 2013
Featured Article Data Bank Focus: See Where Workers Are Saying 'See Ya' February 8, 2013
Featured Article Data Bank Focus: A Shrinking Pool of Job Candidates February 8, 2013
Featured Article Honoring Diversity the Hawaiian Way February 8, 2013
Featured Article Honoring Diversity the McDonald's Way February 8, 2013
Featured Article Defending Diversity February 8, 2013
Featured Article Retirement Showdown February 7, 2013
Featured Article Visa Program Sparks Debate—Again February 7, 2013
Latest News

Court OKs Bias Suit by Worker Who Was Demoted, Replaced

The plaintiff filed suit in May 2008 alleging that the school district she worked for violated the Age Discrimination in Employment Act.

  • Published: August 25, 2010
  • Updated: September 15, 2011
  • Comments (0)
Related Topics:

An Oklahoma City school district employee who was demoted to principal and then replaced by a younger worker with similar responsibilities can pursue her age discrimination suit, a federal appeals court has ruled.

According to Tuesday’s decision by a three-judge panel of the Denver-based 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Judy F. Jones v. Oklahoma City Public Schools, Jones was promoted in 2002 to executive director of curriculum and instruction of the school system.

Beginning in 2006, her supervisors asked questions about when she planned to retire. In 2007, when she was 60, Jones was demoted to principal, a position that paid less after her first year and affected her vacation and retirement benefits, according to the decision.

Shortly afterward, the Oklahoma City Public Schools named a 47-year-old woman to a position that had a different title but with a job description and responsibilities that “were quite similar to those of Jones’ former position” overseeing curriculum and instruction.

Jones filed suit in May 2008, alleging that the school system violated the Age Discrimination in Employment Act.

A lower court held that under the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2000 ruling in Roger Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products Inc., it was not sufficient that Jones had established a prima facie case of age discrimination. The lower court “faulted Jones for not providing any ‘additional evidence’ to show that age played a role in the reassignment decision,” the appeals court panel wrote.

The lower court, though, improperly applied the Reeves decision, the appeals court said.

“Showing that [Oklahoma City Public Schools’] reasons for her transfer were pretextual, Jones was under no obligation to provide additional evidence of age discrimination,” the panel ruled, and remanded the case for further proceedings. 

Filed by Joanne Wojcik of Business Insurance, a sister publication of Workforce Management. To comment, e-mail editors@workforce.com.

 

Stay informed and connected. Get human resources news and HR features via Workforce Management’s Twitter feed or RSS feeds for mobile devices and news readers.

Leave A Comment

Guidelines: Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. You are fully responsible for the content you post.

Stay Connected

Join our community for unlimited access to the latest tips, news and information in the HR world.

Follow Workforce on Twitter
HR Jobs
View All Job Listings

Search