Top
Stories

Featured Article Small Employers Exploring Health Care Exchange Options February 8, 2012
Featured Article Tech Talk February 8, 2012
Featured Article Infor heads to the Big Apple February 8, 2012
Latest News Chrysler Rolling Out Bonuses February 8, 2012
Latest News IT Employment Hits All-Time High February 8, 2012
Featured Article Data Bank Focus: Retirement Benefit Costs February 8, 2012
Latest News Magazine Pans 'Mini-Med' Plans February 7, 2012
The Ethical Workplace Blog Blog Subtle Bias From Grade School to the Workplace February 7, 2012
Featured Article The Rise and Fall of Employer-Sponsored Pension Plans February 6, 2012
Featured Article A ‘Father's' Wisdom: An Interview With Ted Benna February 6, 2012

Latest News

Striking Coca-Cola Workers Benefits to Be Restored

Attorneys also filed a lawsuit against Coca-Cola asserting that the company violated the Employee Retirement Income Security Act when it terminated health benefits for the 500 striking workers.

  • September 1, 2010
  • Comments (0)

Approximately 500 striking Coca-Cola Enterprises Inc. workers in Washington state will have their health benefits restored when they return to work Wednesday, September 1, and contract talks resume, a company spokesman said.

However, the Atlanta-based soft drink company maintains it was within its legal rights to suspend the workers’ health benefits during the work stoppage, which began August 24. The company spokesman also said Monday, August 30, that when health benefits are restored, workers’ contributions will be prorated to reflect the temporary lapse in coverage.

Meanwhile, lawyers for the striking workers filed a motion for a temporary restraining order in U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington in Seattle seeking to force Coca-Cola to restore health benefits retroactively.

Attorneys from the law offices of Schwerin Campbell Barnard Iglitzin & Lavitt also filed a lawsuit against Coca-Cola on Friday, asserting that the company violated the Employee Retirement Income Security Act when it terminated health benefits for the 500 striking workers.

Despite the resumption of contract talks, the workers plan to pursue their litigation, said Dmitri Iglitzin, a partner in the Seattle-based firm.

Although the Coca-Cola spokesman said the company had not yet been served with the suit or the motion for a temporary restraining order, the company believes the litigation has no merit, he said.  

Filed by Joanne Wojcik of Business Insurance, a sister publication of Workforce Management. To comment, e-mail editors@workforce.com.

 

Stay informed and connected. Get human resources news and HR features via Workforce Management’s Twitter feed or RSS feeds for mobile devices and news readers.

Leave A Comment

Guidelines: Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. You are fully responsible for the content you post.

Daily Q&A

Is There a Distinction Between HR Strategy and People Strategy Or Is It Merely Semantics?

Both are essential and need to be highly integrated, but the combination should be invisible to employees.
Just Semantics

Read Answer

Stay Connected

Join our community for unlimited access to the latest tips, news and information in the HR world.

HR Jobs

View All Job Listings

Search