Top
Stories

Featured Article New Pot Laws? No Worries December 13, 2012
Featured Article 2013: A Time for Re-imagining How Work Gets Done December 13, 2012
Featured Article 2013 Employment Forecast: A Fiscal Cliffhanger December 13, 2012
Blog: The Practical Employer 12 is the Magic Number: 12 Thoughts for Your Workplace December 12, 2012
Latest News Clients Kind of Blue Over IBM's 401(k) Surprise December 11, 2012
Blog: Work in Progress Fifty Shades of a Holiday Bonus December 11, 2012
Blog: The Practical Employer What Are Right-To-Work Laws, and Should you Care? December 11, 2012
Featured Article What’s Wrong With Your Diversity Training? December 10, 2012

Latest News

Wedbush Ordered to Pay $3.5 Million for Reprehensible Failure to Compensate Worker

Financial regulatory panel says the brokerage stiffed a municipal sales trader who was owed years worth of incentive compensation.

  • Published: July 12, 2011
  • Updated: September 15, 2011
  • Comments (0)

Wedbush Securities Inc. was ordered to pay a former municipal sales trader, Stephen Kelleher, $3.5 million for failing to give him years worth of the incentive-based compensation he was owed.

A three-person Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc. panel found the firm’s “morally reprehensible failure and refusal to compensate” Kelleher in a timely fashion broke California’s labor laws. A “poorly written and ambiguous employment contract” was partly to blame, the Finra panel said.

“Bringing the suit was a last resort for Mr. Kelleher,” said his attorney, Kit Knudsen, a partner at Commins & Knudsen. “No one wants to be on record being in an adversarial relationship with an employer.”

Kelleher, who joined Wedbush in 2007, had requested $4.2 million in bonus compensation he was due, but is satisfied with the arbitration award, Knudsen said.

Kelleher resigned days after the arbitration case finished up, and he is not working right now, the lawyer said.

Wedbush plans to appeal the ruling, its attorney, John Stetson, said July 8. He would not comment on the case.

Wedbush had been paying Kelleher’s salary, but not the incentive compensation that he was due, Knudsen said. The arbitration panel also blamed “a corporate management structure” that required Edward Wedbush, the majority shareholder in the firm, to approve bonus pay to senior employees. That approval “was routinely withheld,” the Finra panel wrote.

Another Wedbush employee testified that he also went for two years without receiving the incentive-based compensation due him, Knudsen said.

Edward Wedbush was originally named in the lawsuit. Kelleher dropped the case against him during the hearing, however, after Wedbush requested to testify in person, which would have delayed the hearing.  

Filed by Liz Skinner of InvestmentNews, a sister publication of Workforce Management. To comment, email editors@workforce.com.

 

Stay informed and connected. Get human resources news and HR features via Workforce Management’s Twitter feed or RSS feeds for mobile devices and news readers.

Leave A Comment

Guidelines: Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. You are fully responsible for the content you post.

Daily Q&A

How Do We Keep Our Best During Upheaval?

Things are getting scary for us. We recently had to downsize, and since then have lost some of our best people to other jobs. Aside from boosting their pay (which isn't feasible now), what practical steps can we take to keep them from quitting on us?

——Clinging to Hope, talent coordinator, hospitality, Guatemala

Read Answer

Stay Connected

Join our community for unlimited access to the latest tips, news and information in the HR world.

HR Jobs

View All Job Listings

Search