Top
Stories
Featured Article The CYA Report: 'Re-shoring' America February 12, 2013
Blog: The Practical Employer FMLA Compliance Is Not as Easy as the Labor Department Says February 12, 2013
Blog: The Ethical Workplace Credentialing, Competency, and MOOCs February 11, 2013
Blog: The Practical Employer Laughing Out the Door: Half of Employees Admit to Stealing Corporate Data February 11, 2013
Featured Article Data Bank Focus: Getting Them to Stay February 8, 2013
Featured Article Data Bank Focus: See Where Workers Are Saying 'See Ya' February 8, 2013
Featured Article Data Bank Focus: A Shrinking Pool of Job Candidates February 8, 2013
Featured Article Honoring Diversity the Hawaiian Way February 8, 2013
Featured Article Honoring Diversity the McDonald's Way February 8, 2013
Featured Article Defending Diversity February 8, 2013
Featured Article Retirement Showdown February 7, 2013
Featured Article Visa Program Sparks Debate—Again February 7, 2013
Latest News

OSHA Orders Burlington Northern to Pay Whistle-Blower $300,000

The agency said railroad managers followed the employee to the hospital and received an injury report, but later accused the worker of failing to furnish adequate information about the injury.

  • Published: August 23, 2011
  • Updated: September 16, 2011
  • Comments (0)
Related Topics:

The U.S. Occupational Safety & Health Administration has ordered the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Co. to pay $300,000 to a suspended whistle-blower employee.

OSHA’s Seattle office said it ordered the Fort Worth, Texas-based railroad to pay the worker, whom under its policy it did not identify, more than $300,000 in back wages, compensatory damages, attorney fees and punitive damages.

The railroad’s attorneys, Richard Lentini and James Shaker, members of law firm Ryan, Swanson & Cleveland in Cleveland, identified the worker as Jeanette Wallis.

According to OSHA, the worker filed a complaint with the agency stating she was suspended without pay for 30 days after notifying the company of a work-related injury that occurred on Nov. 16, 2008. OSHA’s investigation substantiated the allegation and found “reasonable cause” to believe that the worker was retaliated against in violation of the Federal Railroad Safety Act’s whistle-blower protection provisions, the agency said in a written statement.

OSHA said railroad managers followed the employee to the hospital and received an injury report, but later accused the worker of failing to furnish adequate information about the injury.

The railroad responded to the OSHA release with a copy of an Aug. 20, 2010, letter by the railroad’s lawyers to OSHA’s regional supervisory investigator in Seattle, Victoria Coleman, stating that there were “critical inaccuracies” in the information OSHA provided to the firm.

It said the railroad does not have a policy calling for the suspension or discipline of employees who have been injured, it does not deny promotion or transfers because of injuries, and its employee review process does not assign points to an employee because they are injured regardless of fault.

Wallis “was disciplined because she refused to cooperate in an investigation, not because she reported an injury,” the railroad said in the letter.

Leave A Comment

Guidelines: Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. You are fully responsible for the content you post.

Stay Connected

Join our community for unlimited access to the latest tips, news and information in the HR world.

Follow Workforce on Twitter
HR Jobs
View All Job Listings

Search