Top
Stories

Featured Article 2013: A Time for Re-imagining How Work Gets Done December 13, 2012
Featured Article 2013 Employment Forecast: A Fiscal Cliffhanger December 13, 2012
Blog: The Practical Employer 12 is the Magic Number: 12 Thoughts for Your Workplace December 12, 2012
Latest News Clients Kind of Blue Over IBM's 401(k) Surprise December 11, 2012
Blog: Work in Progress Fifty Shades of a Holiday Bonus December 11, 2012
Blog: The Practical Employer What Are Right-To-Work Laws, and Should you Care? December 11, 2012
Featured Article What’s Wrong With Your Diversity Training? December 10, 2012
Featured Article It’s Mobile HR Software, but It’s Not an App December 10, 2012
Featured Article Five Mobile Apps for Recruiters December 10, 2012

Latest News

OSHA Orders Burlington Northern to Pay Whistle-Blower $300,000

The agency said railroad managers followed the employee to the hospital and received an injury report, but later accused the worker of failing to furnish adequate information about the injury.

  • Published: August 23, 2011
  • Updated: September 16, 2011
  • Comments (0)

The U.S. Occupational Safety & Health Administration has ordered the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Co. to pay $300,000 to a suspended whistle-blower employee.

OSHA’s Seattle office said it ordered the Fort Worth, Texas-based railroad to pay the worker, whom under its policy it did not identify, more than $300,000 in back wages, compensatory damages, attorney fees and punitive damages.

The railroad’s attorneys, Richard Lentini and James Shaker, members of law firm Ryan, Swanson & Cleveland in Cleveland, identified the worker as Jeanette Wallis.

According to OSHA, the worker filed a complaint with the agency stating she was suspended without pay for 30 days after notifying the company of a work-related injury that occurred on Nov. 16, 2008. OSHA’s investigation substantiated the allegation and found “reasonable cause” to believe that the worker was retaliated against in violation of the Federal Railroad Safety Act’s whistle-blower protection provisions, the agency said in a written statement.

OSHA said railroad managers followed the employee to the hospital and received an injury report, but later accused the worker of failing to furnish adequate information about the injury.

The railroad responded to the OSHA release with a copy of an Aug. 20, 2010, letter by the railroad’s lawyers to OSHA’s regional supervisory investigator in Seattle, Victoria Coleman, stating that there were “critical inaccuracies” in the information OSHA provided to the firm.

It said the railroad does not have a policy calling for the suspension or discipline of employees who have been injured, it does not deny promotion or transfers because of injuries, and its employee review process does not assign points to an employee because they are injured regardless of fault.

Wallis “was disciplined because she refused to cooperate in an investigation, not because she reported an injury,” the railroad said in the letter.

Leave A Comment

Guidelines: Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. You are fully responsible for the content you post.

Daily Q&A

How to Address Flagging Motivation?

How do I increase motivation levels in the department? How do I brand my business unit as an attractive place to work? I have top-notch IT professionals in my business unit who feel they are "children of a lesser God" because they are non-billable resources and do not get plum postings abroad, nor the glamour that goes with them. As a result, their motivation suffers.

—-- Feeling Their Pain, human resources generalist, software/services, Mumbai, India

Read Answer

Stay Connected

Join our community for unlimited access to the latest tips, news and information in the HR world.

HR Jobs

View All Job Listings

Search