Top
Stories
Blog: The Practical Employer Reality Bites: Fox Debuts New Workplace Reality Show May 24, 2013
Blog: The Ethical Workplace Restoring Workplace Trust, Part II May 23, 2013
Latest News Disaster Preparedness: Tornadoes May 22, 2013
Blog: The Practical Employer Email Surveillance as Evidence of Retaliation May 22, 2013
Latest News Workforce Software Gets to Work Abroad May 21, 2013
Blog: The Practical Employer Social Media is the Digital Water Cooler May 21, 2013
Blog: The Practical Employer Fired for Suing an Ex-Employer? Court Rejects Public Policy Claim May 20, 2013
Featured Article Explaining Exchanges May 17, 2013
Featured Article Breaking Down the Language Barrier May 16, 2013
Featured Article Now, You’re Speaking My Language May 16, 2013
Latest News

EEOC Files Charges Against Burger King in Workplace Attire Dispute

Ashanti McShan was assured she could wear a skirt to work, but when she arrived at work for orientation, store management told her she could not do so, and she was told to leave the store. McShan is a Pentecostal Christian, a denomination that requires women to wear only skirts or dresses.

  • Comments (0)
Related Topics:

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has filed suit against a Burger King franchise for allegedly terminating a worker who wore a skirt rather than uniform trousers for religious reasons.

According to the lawsuit filed Wednesday in U.S. District Court in Dallas in EEOC v. Fries Restaurant Management L.L.C., when Ashanti McShan, was hired as a cashier at the Grand Prairie, Texas, Burger King in August 2010, she had asked to wear a skirt instead of uniform pants as a religious accommodation. McShan is a Pentecostal Christian, a denomination that requires women to wear only skirts or dresses, according to the lawsuit.

She was assured she could wear a skirt to work, but when she arrived at work for orientation, store management told her she could not do so, and she was told to leave the store.

The lawsuit charges Fries Restaurant with violating Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by failing to accommodate McShan's religious beliefs. It seeks back pay, compensatory and punitive damages and injunctive relief.

Dallas-based EEOC regional attorney Robert A. Canino said in a statement, "We haven't come far enough in our respect of religious liberties at the workplace if we have employers saying that uniform policies trump a religious observance without articulation of any hardship posed by letting an employee 'hold the pickles' and 'hold the lettuce' while wearing a skirt."

A spokesman for Fries Restaurant could not immediately be reached for comment.

This month, the EEOC announced a steel mill services company had agreed to pay $30,000 to settle a religious discrimination case in which a worker complained he was not permitted to go to church regularly.

Judy Greenwald writes for Business Insurance, a sister publication of Workforce Management. To comment, email editors@workforce.com.

Stay informed and connected. Get human resources news and HR features via Workforce Management's Twitter feed or RSS feeds for mobile devices and news readers.

Leave A Comment

Guidelines: Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. You are fully responsible for the content you post.

Stay Connected

Join our community for unlimited access to the latest tips, news and information in the HR world.

Follow Workforce on Twitter
HR Jobs
View All Job Listings

Search