Top
Stories
Blog: The Ethical Workplace Credentialing, Competency, and MOOCs February 11, 2013
Blog: The Practical Employer Laughing Out the Door: Half of Employees Admit to Stealing Corporate Data February 11, 2013
Featured Article Data Bank Focus: Getting Them to Stay February 8, 2013
Featured Article Data Bank Focus: See Where Workers Are Saying 'See Ya' February 8, 2013
Featured Article Data Bank Focus: A Shrinking Pool of Job Candidates February 8, 2013
Featured Article Honoring Diversity the Hawaiian Way February 8, 2013
Featured Article Honoring Diversity the McDonald's Way February 8, 2013
Featured Article Defending Diversity February 8, 2013
Featured Article Retirement Showdown February 7, 2013
Featured Article Visa Program Sparks Debate—Again February 7, 2013
Featured Article Homeward Bound February 7, 2013
Blog: The Practical Employer Workplace Social Media Policies Must Account for Generational Issues February 7, 2013
Latest News

Pre-existing Perspective: New York Court Rules Against Reimbursing Employer

A New York Appellate court ruled that an injured worker's diabetes and obesity do not qualify as pre-existing conditions.

  • By Max Mihelich
  • Published: February 11, 2013
  • Comments (0)
Related Topics:

An injured worker's diabetes and obesity are not pre-existing conditions that would allow New York's Special Disability Fund to reimburse her employer for workers' compensation benefits, a New York appellate court ruled on Jan. 31.

The self-insured Schenectady Community Action Program Inc. sought reimbursement from the Special Disability Fund for JoAnn LaDuke's workers' compensation benefits. LaDuke was an employee of the program for nearly 20 years when she sustained back and shoulder injuries while assisting students exiting a bus in May 2002, according to court records.

New York's disability fund argued it was not liable for LaDuke's benefits, as the New York State Worker's Compensation Board had initially determined. The New York appellate court reversed the compensation board's decision.

The court ruled LaDuke's diabetes and obesity did not hinder her ability to perform her job.

The "claimant testified that, although she had suffered from diabetes for over 20 years, it was controlled through oral medication and had never affected her ability to perform the job," according to the court's ruling.

As for her obesity, LaDuke testified that she had "always been heavy" and it never proved a hindrance to her job performance. "In any event, claimant testified that she had never been diagnosed with a medial condition that caused her obesity, and there is no instance in which obesity, lacking a medical basis that would ensure permanency, has been found to be a pre-existing condition," the court ruled.

Max Mihelich is Workforce's editorial intern. Comment below or email editors@workforce.com

Leave A Comment

Guidelines: Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. You are fully responsible for the content you post.

Stay Connected

Join our community for unlimited access to the latest tips, news and information in the HR world.

Follow Workforce on Twitter
HR Jobs
View All Job Listings

Search