RSS icon

Top Stories

No NLRA Protection for Union ‘Salts’

November 5, 2007
Related Topics: Labor Relations, Featured Article
From 1994 to 1996, the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers engaged in a "salting campaign" against Toering, a nonunion electrical company in western Michigan. The campaign included the union submitting job applications to Toering on behalf of its members to prompt the company's rejection of the job applicants, followed by the union filing unfair labor practice charges with the National Labor Relations Board, alleging that the applicants were rejected because of union affiliation. These salting tactics were intended to impose on Toering and nonunion employers the expenses of defending legal proceedings, to disrupt the nonunion employer's workforce through unfair labor practices strikes, and to force nonunion employers out of business.

    When 18 members were not hired by Toering, the union filed discrimination charges against the company with the NLRB. Some of the applications were from individuals who already held employment and were not actively looking for work, or were submitted by the union without their prior consent by the applicants. After a hearing, an administrative law judge concluded that Toering had unlawfully refused to hire the applicants.

    Reversing the judge's decision, the NLRB's majority held that the National Labor Relations Act protects only persons genuinely interested in obtaining employment with the employer. "[O]nly those individuals genuinely interested in becoming employees can be discriminatorily denied that opportunity on the basis of their union affiliation or activity; one cannot be denied what one does not genuinely seek." The board reasoned that only job applicants who were actually deprived of employment opportunities should be protected by the NLRA. Toering Electric Co., 351 NLRB No. 18 (9/29/07).

    Impact: Employers confronted with a salting campaign can lawfully refuse to hire union-affiliated job applicants for any number of legitimate, nondiscriminatory reasons. Applicants may also be rejected if they do not intend to genuinely seek employment.

Workforce Management, October 22, 2007, p. 7 -- Subscribe Now!

Recent Articles by James E. Hall, Mark T. Kobata, Marty Denis and D. Diane Hatch

Comments powered by Disqus

Hr Jobs

View All Job Listings