You might expect Yahoo to be suffering from recruiting and retention troubles
these days, given all the turmoil at the Internet giant.
Uncertainty about Yahoo’s future rose dramatically this week, amid news of a
Yahoo move to test Google’s search-related ad service and reports of possible
AOL-Yahoo and Microsoft-News Corp.-Yahoo deals. These headlines followed an
ultimatum Saturday, April 5, from Microsoft warning Yahoo to come to terms on a
Microsoft acquisition within three weeks or face a possible fight for control of
Yahoo’s board of directors.
But attrition has not increased at the Sunnyvale, California-based company
since Microsoft’s initial offer in February, Yahoo said in late March. And the
number of applicants actually has been growing—a trend that may owe in part to a
new severance policy for all full-time employees in the event of an
acquisition.
On the other hand, talent management at Yahoo is not exactly business as
usual. It takes longer to walk candidates through concerns they have, says Carol
Mahoney, Yahoo’s vice president of talent acquisition. Mahoney says it isn’t
harder to convince candidates about Yahoo, but “it’s more time-consuming.”
Yahoo, a pioneer on the Internet, has weathered turbulent times over the past
year, including the departure of CEO Terry Semel and slumping profits. As part
of an effort to refocus the company, Yahoo cut 1,000 jobs this year.
Another major source of upheaval was Microsoft’s unsolicited bid to acquire
Yahoo for $44.6 billion in cash and stock. Yahoo rejected the bid as too low,
touting plans to make gains in the online ad market and become the “starting
point” for the greatest number of consumers. The company has 1,000 job openings
as it pursues its new strategy, Mahoney says.
Microsoft turned up the heat Saturday in a letter signed by Steve Ballmer,
CEO of the Redmond, Washington-based software titan. “If we have not concluded
an agreement within the next three weeks, we will be compelled to take our case
directly to your shareholders, including the initiation of a proxy contest to
elect an alternative slate of directors for the Yahoo! board,” Ballmer wrote. He
also implied that Microsoft would lower its price.
Yahoo’s board on Monday again rejected Microsoft’s offer, but said it was
open to a deal with Microsoft under the right conditions.
Then came word of the test with Google, which raises questions about broader
collaboration between Yahoo and its Internet rival. Adding to the mix were
reports about a possible AOL-Yahoo tie-up and the prospect of a partnership
between media giant News Corp. and Microsoft to acquire Yahoo.
It is unclear whether a merger with Microsoft would curb Yahoo’s famed
culture of fun—or lead to more layoffs. Yahoo had 14,300 employees at the end of
2007. Microsoft had 78,565 employees as of last June.
The prospect of going to work for “Microhoo” could hurt Yahoo’s recruiting,
observers say.
“I hope a merger doesn’t change Yahoo’s corporate culture,” says an MBA
student who recently applied for a Yahoo summer internship and asked not to be
identified. “Both are good names to have on your résumé, but I would rather work
for a company like Yahoo than for Microsoft, because of its culture.”
New severance plans that would be triggered by a change in control at the
company help Yahoo’s recruiting, Mahoney says. Benefits under the plans include
four to 24 months of severance pay and health coverage. The new policy is “an
anxiety reducer” for anyone nervous about joining an acquisition target, Mahoney
says.
Many companies have change-in-control agreements for executives. Yahoo’s
approach stands out because it covers all full-time employees.
—Gina Ruiz and Ed Frauenheim