Ruling Could Spur Hiring Bias Against Obese Workers
An Indiana state court’s ruling that would require a small business to pay for weight-loss surgery could make employers more cautious when hiring obese people, employment attorneys say.
Comments 0 | Recommend 0
October 19, 2009
Ruling Could Spur Hiring Bias Against Obese Workers
An Indiana state court’s ruling that would require a small business to pay
for weight-loss surgery could make employers more cautious when hiring obese
people, employment attorneys say.
The Indiana Court of Appeals upheld a
workers’ compensation board ruling in August that pizza chain Boston’s The
Gourmet Pizza would be required to pay for the weight-loss surgery of a former
cook, Adam Childers, after doctors said the procedure was necessary to fix a
back injury he suffered on the job in 2007.
The ruling mirrored a similar
finding in August by the Oregon Supreme Court in which an employer was told to
pay for weight-loss surgery for an employee whose workplace injury required a
knee replacement.
“How do you deal with the fact that … hiring somebody could
potentially bankrupt you?” Lazzarotti says. “As a small-business owner, people
might think of that and weigh the risks of a [discrimination] claim because the
alternative is they may be bankrupt.”
Weight generally is not considered a disability covered under
the Americans with Disabilities Act despite changes that went into effect in
January broadening the definition of a disability, says Ramona L. Paetzold, a
professor at Mays Business School at Texas A&M University.
“We
don’t know yet if [the changes to the ADA] will include people on the basis of
weight,” Paetzold says. “If so, what will ‘obese’ be defined as, and will causes
of obesity play a role?”
If obesity is included under the ADA, it would
likely be narrowly defined to exclude a condition that is the result of a
person’s lifestyle.
While there have been few cases like the one in
Indiana, the growth of obesity in the workplace may lead to more workers’
compensation or discrimination cases.
If the courts recognize obesity as a disability, millions of obese Americans
could potentially claim discrimination. About two-thirds of Americans are
overweight, and 27 percent—about 72 million—are obese, according to data from
the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
The recent workers’
compensation rulings, meanwhile, could lead companies to narrowly define a
person’s job so that employers are not held accountable for a workplace injury
that falls outside their job role, says Michael McAuliffe Miller, an attorney in
the labor and employment group of Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott in
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania.
“To avoid the outcome of the Boston case,
employers have to make sure that the people they hire are physically able to do
the job,” he says.
Still, Miller says the ruling may not have broad legal
implications for employers.
A key fact that went against the company
was that Childers’ weight ballooned from 340 pounds to 380 pounds after he
stopped working.
A doctor concluded that Childers’ back recovery was
“doomed to failure” unless he lost weight. After physical therapy worsened
Childers’ back pain, his doctor recommended back surgery.
The company
argued that Childers’ weight constituted a pre-existing condition for which it
was not responsible.
Citing a precedent in a case involving a longtime
smoker, the court ruled differently. It said the employee’s pre-existing
obesity, combined with his back injury and subsequent weight gain, formed a new
work-related “single injury” the employer was responsible for
treating.
One policy resolution, Lazzarotti says, could be for states
to create insurance pools for obesity-related workers’ compensation claims
similar to “second injury funds” established to encourage workers to hire
disabled individuals. The funds help employers pay for pre-existing disabilities
further complicated by workplace injuries.
Guidelines: Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed
from the site. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies
or any other policies governing this site. You are fully responsible for the content you post.
If you enjoy the content on the Workforce Management Web site and want to see more, try 3 issues of our print edition risk-free. If you wish to continue, you will receive one full year for just $79. That's over 59% off the cover price. If you decide Workforce Management is not for you, just write "Cancel" on the invoice, return it and owe nothing. The 3 issues are yours to keep with no further obligation to us. Sign up below.
Offer valid for new Workforce Management Subscribers only.
Canada subscribers - $129. All other Foreign - $199.