At a time when many employers are asking employees to shoulder a greater
share of the health care cost burden, IBM Corp. is taking the opposite approach:
It will pay 100 percent of the cost of primary care for its employees beginning
in 2010.
Long considered one of the more innovative employers when it comes to its
health care benefit programs, IBM’s latest initiative is part of the company’s
ongoing advocacy of wellness among its employees, according to Marianne Defazio,
director of health benefits design and strategy.
The Armonk, New York-based technology firm introduced cash rebates in 2004
for participation in wellness activities and has been covering preventive care
at 100 percent since 2006, she said.
The company also has participated in pilots involving medical homes, a health
management model in which each patient has an ongoing relationship with a
primary care physician who serves as a personal “health coach,” leading a team
of medical professionals that takes collective responsibility for delivering
care.
Though the decision to use financial incentives to encourage greater use of
primary care complements the ongoing medical home projects, it is independent
from it, and employees will not be required to designate a primary care
physician to be their medical home in order to become eligible for the coverage,
Defazio said.
Rather, all employees enrolled in IBM’s self-insured health care plans will
receive full coverage throughout the year—with no co-payments, co-insurance or
deductible—for in-network primary care visits with their internist, family
practitioner, pediatrician, general practitioner or primary osteopath.
“We believe very strongly that employees should have a primary care physician
who’s sort of the quarterback to help coordinate all of their care. But we’re
not requiring that employees or their families have one primary care doctor,”
she said.
The coverage will extend to employees enrolled in IBM’s
high-deductible/health savings account plan, after the deductible is met,
according to Defazio.
IBM offers five health plan options: three self-insured preferred provider
plans, one self-insured HDHP with a health savings account, and, in some
locations, a health maintenance organization.
Approximately 80 percent of IBM’s 115,000 U.S. employees are enrolled in the
company’s self-insured health care plans, about 5 percent of whom participate in
the HDHP. The remainder of IBM’s employees are enrolled in health maintenance
organization plans that already provide preventive and primary care services at
a low or no cost.
Though primary care visits will be covered at 100 percent, any lab tests,
X-rays or radiology and prescription drugs will remain subject to the coverage
terms of the plan in which each employee is enrolled, according to Defazio.
Co-insurance generally is around 20 percent, she said.
As with past initiatives, IBM will track and document the financial impact of
its new program, as well as how it affects employee health, Defazio said.
For example, IBM’s research shows that the $79 million investment it made in
wellness and preventive care between 2004 and 2007 saved the company and its
employees nearly $191 million in health-related costs.
IBM’s support also has produced dramatic increases in healthy behavior among
its employees, such as increased physical activity and healthier eating. Of the
company’s 115,000 U.S. employees, 80,000 report they exercise regularly,
according to Defazio.
IBM’s health promotion efforts also have tempered the rate of increase in the
company’s health care costs, she said, noting that “IBM’s costs remain lower
than the national average,” with cost increases measuring in the “low single
digits.”
For the most part, benefit experts applaud IBM’s overture, though some
expressed concern about the temporary cost spike they are likely to
experience.
“If you take away co-pays, there’s an immediate cost,” noted Helen Darling,
president of the National Business Group on Health in Washington. On the other
hand, “one of the messages they’re trying to send is that the average American
sees too many specialists. If they have a pain in their stomach, they think they
need to see a gastroenterologist,” when a primary care doctor will suffice, she
said.
“I think they are smart because we’ve seen for years a primary care physician
is a lower-cost and more efficient way to treat patients as opposed to sending
them to specialists,” said Shawn Jenkins, CEO of Benefitfocus, a health care
software vendor in Charleston, South Carolina.
In many ways, what IBM is doing is similar to Pitney Bowes’ lowering of
co-payments for drugs prescribed to employees with chronic conditions, observed
Francois de Brantes, CEO of Newton, Connecticut-based Bridges to Excellence, an
employer-led pay-for-performance program.
“It’s consistent with a lot of the work that is being done in value-based
benefit design. You want to encourage active involvement of patients in primary
care,” he said.
“IBM is to be commended for taking an enlightened approach to incentivizing
employees to get regular primary care to prevent illness and manage any chronic
conditions that they have,” said Laurel Pickering, director of the New York
Business Group on Health. “This is value-based benefit design.”
“IBM’s decision to remove patient contributions to primary care visits is an
important illustration that value-based insurance design programs go beyond
prescription drugs,” agreed Dr. Mark Fendrick, co-director of the Center for
Value-Based Insurance Design at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor, in an
e-mail. “These patient incentives fit perfectly with their innovative
patient-centered medical home initiatives.”
Raymond Brusca, vice president of benefits at Black & Decker Corp. in
Towson, Maryland, wrote in an e-mail, “The question is, will this result in
lower overall costs through increased attention to medical issues before they
grow into more complex and costly conditions? Using the lessons learned from the
value-based benefit initiatives, one could argue that this will pay off in the
long run. After several years’ worth of data, it will be interesting to see if
this broader application of the value-based theories has merit.”
“Employers are looking for ways to get better value for what they’re
spending. More primary care is probably better for people, and if you can
eliminate some financial obstacles, that’s a good thing,” observed Steve
Raetzman, senior consultant at Watson Wyatt Worldwide in Arlington,
Virginia.
“I’ve seen people look at putting primary care before the deductible,” said
Mike Thompson, a principal with PricewaterhouseCoopers in New York. “One of the
issues around consumerism is, we really would like people to take control of
their own health, but sometimes they’re not fully qualified to do so. By
eliminating barriers to primary care, it enables people to make informed
choices.”
Filed by Joanne Wojcik of
Business Insurance