1. Create Great Customer Service
The NY Department of Civil Service's transformation of a bloated, unworkable bureaucracy focused on flexibility, efficiency, recruiting, and innovation.
3. OPM Writes the Book on Government HR Practices
The federal Office of Personnel Management is working to create a government-wide HR function. Its online reports spell out the federal government’s business areas and the people management processes that support them.
President Barack Obama’s call to civil service has resonated widely, but the new administration faces the same recruiting, retention and development challenges that bedeviled its predecessors.
By Mark Schoeff Jr. Comments 0 | Recommend 0
resident
Barack Obama has tried to model himself after Abraham Lincoln. When it comes to
the federal workforce, a more apt comparison may be John F. Kennedy.
Obama hasn’t exhorted Americans to ask themselves what they can do for their country.
But early indications are that he has inspired them to consider working for their
country.
The administration, however, faces the same recruiting, retention
and development challenges that have bedeviled its predecessors in managing the
huge federal bureaucracy, which totaled 1.9 million executive branch employees in
2008.
The government must solve turnover problems among young employees,
fill gaps in the midcareer ranks and find a way to hold on to workers who are nearing
retirement, according to experts. It also has to make applying for a civil service
job less onerous.
Initially, it looks as if the "hope" and "change" themes of
the Obama campaign are carrying over to governance.
"He’s already on his way to making government cool again,"
says Max Stier, president and CEO of Partnership for Public Service, a nonpartisan,
nonprofit group promoting effective government.
As of Inauguration Day, about 400,000 applications had been
submitted for administration political appointments through the Web site Change.gov.
Those positions number about 7,000 across federal agencies. The site was shut down
after Obama was sworn in, and visitors were referred to the jobs section of www.white
house.gov, which is still under construction but will presumably connect to the
Office of Presidential Personnel when it is completed.
For those interested in civil service jobs, Change.gov provided
a link to USA jobs.com, the official site for federal government employment. In
early January, about 2.8 million people were visiting each week, up about 500,000
per week from the summer, according to Stier.
"This is a new era of hands-on government and more active
government, and Obama is bringing a lot more people into it," says John Hamre, president
and CEO of the Center for Strategic and International Studies, a Washington think
tank.
Although the jobs section of Change.gov was just a one-page
information form, Stier says it was useful in channeling the enthusiasm for administration
jobs.
"He's already on his way to making government cool again."
—Max Stier,
Partnership for Public Service
"It does appear to me, from the bleacher seats, they have
been effective in providing a single portal that is easy to use and informative,
which is an accomplishment," Stier says.
But given the Internet savvy of the Obama campaign, which
reached out to some 10 million people, some observers expected Change.gov to garner
more than a few hundred thousand applications.
"I would characterize that as low volume," says Linda Brooks
Rix, co-CEO of Avue, a human capital management software company in Washington.
"I would have expected that number to be in the seven figures."
One of the problems with Change.gov, according to Rix, was
that it didn’t identify specific openings. Avue’s transitionjobs.us site offers
an online version of the "Plum Book," which lists federal jobs that are filled by
political appointment.
Another Change.gov shortcoming was that it was more of an
aggregator of résumés than a device for identifying talent. Most of those decisions
will be made the old-fashioned way—through connections and personal references.
"I don’t think it will have much value as a selecting tool,"
says Scott Cameron, director of global public sector at consulting firm Grant Thornton
in Alexandria, Virginia.
Difficult to apply
For fired-up job seekers, indicating interest in a federal
job, either online or by contacting an administration official, is only the beginning
of a long process that could include filling out many forms and answering dozens
of questions.
Similar challenges exist in applying for other federal jobs.
Although the Office of Personnel Management launched an initiative to significantly
reduce the lag between receiving a résumé and making a job offer, the process can
still take several months.
"It’s a nightmare to apply for a federal civil service job,"
Cameron says. "If any American company recruited people … the same way the federal
government does, then that company would be out of business very soon."
Recruiting is just one of many deficiencies in federal workforce
management.
"You have this massive capital outlay that you can't see, you can't track and you can't manage."
—Linda Brooks Rix, Avue
"Our government’s current system for recruiting, hiring, compensating,
training and managing people is broken in too many places," states a recent report
by Grant Thornton and the Partnership for Public Service.
The report is based on interviews with chief human capital
officers throughout the government. "As a result, federal agencies struggle to bring
in top talent, often don’t fully utilize the skills of current civil servants, or
simply lack enough of the right talent."
‘A crisis of competence’
Experts say recent government missteps ranging from the botched
response to Hurricane Katrina in 2005 to more recent crises like approving tainted
toys from China and failing to detect a $50 billion financial Ponzi scheme can be
traced back to personnel failures.
With the government being called on to bail out financial
markets and pull the country out of a recession, the demands on civil service are
sure to grow. But the enthusiasm generated by Obama’s ascension to the White House
is concentrated mostly among young people just starting their careers.
The real strain in the federal workforce is in the more experienced
ranks. Hamre, a former deputy secretary of defense, says the government "lacks effective
ways to bring people in midgrade."
He says too many people drop off "the conveyor belt" as they
move from the low levels at which they were hired to more senior jobs. Part of the
problem is that the government has provided only cost-of-living adjustments rather
than real raises for nearly two decades.
The result is that top civil service performers have departed
for the private sector. Many senior managers who have stayed on board are within
a few years of retirement.
"I believe we have a crisis of competence in the government,"
Hamre says. "We have not brought in talent in systematic ways for the past 15 years.
Government is seriously enfeebled precisely at a time when we need a stronger, more
capable and sophisticated government."
As in-house talent shrinks, the government has increasingly
turned to outside firms to perform services. From 1999 to 2005, the number of federal
contractors grew by more than 50 percent to 10.5 million, according to the Congressional
Research Service. Critics say that the George W. Bush administration contributed
to the trend with its emphasis on privatization.
The shift has inherent drawbacks, Rix says. Contractors are
hired through the procurement office of an agency, sometimes causing a disconnect
with the HR department.
"You have this massive capital outlay that you can’t see,
you can’t track and you can’t manage," Rix says. "You have a system that is not
agile ... and [is] ripe for corruption."
Avue is encouraging the Obama administration to "insource"
more federal work by hiring civil service employees. "We don’t have enough expertise
in-house to provide oversight of government contractors," Rix says.
A talent pipeline If the government starts to rely more on its own workforce,
it should put more emphasis on talent management, says Maria Grant, federal human-capital
practice leader at Deloitte in Washington.
For instance, the government has a shortage of Food and Drug
Administration inspectors. It needs to think through the skills required for the
position and work with colleges to produce graduates who are qualified and inspired
for the work.
The objective is to go beyond simply filling openings.
"We must have much more robust leadership development programs
and succession planning," Grant says. "I’m hoping that the new administration takes
a more holistic view and develops a comprehensive workforce planning strategy."
But the first order of business is to make it easier for everyone
who has renewed enthusiasm about government work to apply for federal jobs.
"If [Obama] can do that, he will make a major contribution
that will extend far beyond his four or eight years in office," says Grant Thornton’s
Cameron.
Workforce Management Online, March 2009 — Register Now!
Mark Schoeff is a Workforce Management staff writer
based in Washington. E-mail editors@workforce.com to
comment.
Reproductions and distribution of the above article are strictly prohibited. To order reprints and/or request permission to use the article in full or partial format, please contact our Reprint Sales Manager at (732) 723-0569.
Comments
Guidelines: Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed
from the site. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies
or any other policies governing this site. You are fully responsible for the content you post.